The Deep Speculation on the Vax

I have been thinking for a while that obviously that this vax is harmful and likely very dangerous but I want to hear some deep speculation on it.  So many people are guarded when they talk about it because they are often medical or another type of professional and don’t want to speculate too much.  Though I understand that people don’t want to go out too far on a limb, I think it is about time that we start speculating on what the ramifications of these vaccinations are going to be.

Here is what we know.

  1.  Everything points to the fact the whole pandemic was planned years in advance.
  2.  There seem many purposes to this plan but the vaccine seems to be the end goal, everything was about injecting a new gene therapy “vaccine” into every human being on the planet.
  3. We know almost nothing about this vaccine.  No animal trials were done and already the death count is higher than all other vaccines of the last 30 years combined. revovler news chart vax deaths
  4. We also know that every alternative treatment has been covered up.

So what is all this about?  If there really was a new dangerous pandemic sweeping the world why use a total novel technology of the mRNA vaccine?  Why not use a traditional vaccine?  Wouldn’t a traditional vaccine be the most safe and prudent route?  Why no long term studies on animals?  Why is phycological warfare being used on the public?  How is the CDC and the WHO been wrong on almost every point and contradict there own standards of pandemic response?  Why not have a rigorous tracking system to find out what is happening with vaccine injuries for a vaccine that is brand new and developed in less than a year as opposed to the usual ten years?

Intelligent people already know something is up, so now is the time for some healthy speculation in this writer’s humble opinion.  Luckily, Mike Adams from Natural News and Omaha native Dr. Lee Merritt discuss some of the more wild possibilities with the vaccine along with many interesting details that they have been hearing.

People have often been reported to be in a trance like state after taking the vaccine.

Why did the virus not spread throughout the world in the same way it did in New York, Lombardy, and Wuhan?  After these initial hot zones the virus seemed to get much more mild.  Was there some kind of genetic poison attack on these cities?

Are there nano technology in these vaccines?  Could they affect brain function and alter mood?  Could they be used for mind control?

The behavior of mice has been changed in the past through magnetic effects.

A wide range of reports show that people are being magnetized.

The spike protein has been found in the ovaries at a much higher concentration than other parts of the body.  Dr Lee Merritt says that they have the technology to target certain organs.

Doctors and nurses were vaccinated first, even over the elderly, did this somehow effect the critical thinking ability of the doctors?

Most strangely of all, there have been reports of people’s pets attacking them after they have received the vaccine.  Also babies have refused to nurse from their mothers after their mothers have been vaccinated (reported in Israel).   Are these vaccines changing human beings in some way we don’t understand?

If people’s DNA is being changed are they still human?  What is human?

Mike Adams and Dr Lee Merritt tackle all these questions and more.  Interesting times for humanity lie ahead.

mad max art 1

 

98,381 thoughts on “The Deep Speculation on the Vax

  1. After checking out a handful of the articles on your blog, I truly appreciate your way of blogging.
    I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. Please check out my web site too and let
    me know your opinion.

  2. Excellent post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Very useful information specifically the last part 🙂 I care
    for such information much. I was seeking this particular information for a very long time.
    Thank you and best of luck.

  3. NASA scientists are in a state of anxious limbo after the Trump administration proposed a budget that would eliminate one of the United States’ top climate labs – the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, or GISS – as a standalone entity.
    kra35.cc
    In its place, it would move some of the lab’s functions into a broader environmental modeling effort across the agency.

    Career specialists are now working remotely, awaiting details and even more unsure about their future at the lab after they were kicked out of their longtime home in New York City last week. Closing the lab for good could jeopardize its value and the country’s leadership role in global climate science, sources say.

    “It’s an absolute sh*tshow,” one GISS scientist said under condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. “Morale at GISS has never been lower, and it feels for all of us that we are being abandoned by NASA leadership.”

    “We are supposedly going to be integrated into this new virtual NASA modeling institute, but (we have) no idea what that will actually look like,” they said.

    NASA is defending its budget proposal, with a nod toward the lab’s future.
    “NASA’s GISS has a significant place in the history of space science and its work is critical for the Earth Science Division, particularly as the division looks to the future of its modeling work and capabilities,” NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement.

    “Fundamental contributions in research and applications from GISS directly impact daily life by showing the Earth system connections that impact the air we breathe, our health, the food we grow, and the cities we live in,” Warner said.

    GISS has a storied history in climate science on the global scale.

    James Hansen, a former director, first called national attention to human-caused global warming at a Senate hearing during the hot summer of 1988. The lab, founded in 1961, is still known worldwide for its computer modeling of the planet that enable scientists to make projections for how climate change may affect global temperatures, precipitation, extreme weather events and other variables.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *