Huge, John Hopkins Admitts That Coronavirus has Not Raised Total US Death Toll, Proves Virus Panic A Hoax

John Hopkins just published an article that the death toll for 2020 is not higher than any other year.  This is really big news because if humanity is going through the greatest “pandemic” ever the death toll would obviously be up from previous years but strangely (not strange to readers here) the overall death toll has not gone up.  John Hopkins goes into detail how in actual fact that all other deaths are going down and are actually being classified as Covid.  Anyone who has not been slavishly watching mainstream news likely already knows this.  The CDC itself has admitted the death count from Covid is highly exaggerated. People that die “with” Covid, not “from” Covid are counted in the overall death toll.

 

So even though Covid may be killing people, it is not killing any more people than would have died anyway on any given year.  People die, this is a normal part of life.  People that have weakened health that have died from Covid would have died from something else statistically. John Hopkins even goes into detail about how people dying from heart disease are being classified as Covid.  The article goes into great deapth about this.

From the study:

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. 

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths. 

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

This comes as a shock to many people. How is it that the data lie so far from our perception?

To answer that question, Briand shifted her focus to the deaths per causes ranging from 2014 to 2020. There is a sudden increase in deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19. This is no surprise because COVID-19 emerged in the U.S. in early 2020, and thus COVID-19-related deaths increased drastically afterward.

Analysis of deaths per cause in 2018 revealed that the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes, with the top three being heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia.

“This is true every year. Every year in the U.S. when we observe the seasonal ups and downs, we have an increase of deaths due to all causes,” Briand pointed out.

Here is where the whole thing is blown apart

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 

The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.

In an interview with The News-Letter, Briand addressed the question of whether COVID-19 deaths can be called misleading since the infection might have exacerbated and even led to deaths by other underlying diseases.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

In other words, the effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the U.S. is considered problematic only when it increases the total number of deaths or the true death burden by a significant amount in addition to the expected deaths by other causes. Since the crude number of total deaths by all causes before and after COVID-19 has stayed the same, one can hardly say, in Briand’s view, that COVID-19 deaths are concerning.

 

Overall, the dynamics of life and death have not changed this year from any other year. This should be celebrated from the roof tops that this virus is not nearly as deadly as we have been told.  It should be celebrated that we can go back to our normal lives and that these lockdowns have been a horrible mistake.  It should be celebrated that the greatest infringement of liberties in the Western World is over.  Instead, the power structure is doubling down. They are going to keep pushing totally ineffective mask mandates.  They are going to continue to push vaccine IDs and passports.  They are going to continue to push for medical marshal law.  

The article was pulled from John Hopkin’s website because people were using it to spread “false information” but luckily the article is still saved in the archive 

 

Who is Q?

There is a lot of stuff in here so I will let the viewer decide.  This basically sums up what the Q Anon people believe.  I do think there are very bad people in very high places but are there good guys in a secret war with them?  To be honest it seems somewhat unlikely to me but I have started to warm to the idea bit for the mere fact that the power structure is afraid of these ideas.

  It is interesting how hard it is to find any Q Anon stuff on the internet anymore.  The censors are going into overdrive trying to supress this Q. So why would the “powers at be” try to supress Q Anon so much if there was nothing there?  Is it not a foundational idea of democracy that all sides have a right to engage in the realm of ideas?  If the public has to be protected against ideas, what does that say about democracy itself?  Youtube and Big Tech have completely censored any Q Anon material, therefore, for the sake of posterity, I would like to post a bit here.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MYHTpUW9KAXQ/

I wish I had more but some of the previous things that I have seen have already been wiped from the internet.  I will keep looking.

 

 

 

 

Tom Woods Gives Speech to over 100 State Senators about Lockdowns

Tom Woods nails it again: “The deaths from Covid, as tragic as they are, are a drop in the bucket compared to the long term effects of these horrific policies”.

Tom Woods has been one of the great anti-lockdown advocates on the internet, of course you will never hear about him or anyone like him from the mainstream media.  The media has censored any dissenting opinions on this Covid push, probably because the rational for lockdowns and masks are so weak they can not allow any dissent because it would become so obvious how vile these unconstitutional policies about masks and lockdowns are. The ones that stand against the tide of this mass hysteria are the great heroes of our time.  Covid response has become the largest public health fiasco in the history of the world.  The lives lost due to lockdown, the economic devastation, the fraying of public bonds, and the dramatic increase suicide and mental health problems all could have easily been avoided by simply using common sense.  Instead we are looking at the largest government overreach in our lifetimes and we will be lucky if anything can ever go back to normal.  The damage done already has been so immense that it is almost unimaginable but this is likely just the beginning.  Governments are going to push for mandatory untested vaccines that change human DNA, vaccine passports and ID cards, and eventually bio-metric chip that seems very ominous for any that look into it.

Lockdowns Equal Mass Death

Any individual that belives in lockdowns believes in mass death.  There is no other way to put it. Many orders of magnitude of people are going to be killed by lockdowns than any flue virus including Covid-19.  I know many people know this but it is truly mind boggeling how many people ignore this or don’t seem to care.  This statistics are very easy to find and the WHO themselves are against lockdowns but most people simpely watch what they see on TV and believe it.  If I bring up the facts to lockdown propenents (strange that these are ideas people believe in at all) they simply ignore the statement.  If more people die from lockdowns what is the possible point of doing lockdowns?  I don’t think anyone really knows.  The data cannot be disputed, so instead it is ignored or purposly censored.

James Corbett, once again, has been great on this issue

“If you are advocating for lockdowns, you are complicit in tearing families apart. You are complicit in inflicting untold suffering on millions of people around the world. You are complicit in casting the poorest and most vulnerable in our societies into even further grinding poverty. You are complicit in murder.”

 

And of course Tom Woods.  The following is from his website:

Death by Lockdown

I almost don’t blame people who are unaware of this information, because you have to go to the UK, usually, or the international press in general, to find it. But here is some of the collateral damage caused by lockdowns.

(1) In the UK, cancer authorities have been warning that the lockdowns will wind up leading to as many or more avoidable cancer deaths than COVID deaths there — as many as 60,000, according to one estimate.

The UK’s Sunday Express – not exactly some obscure dispatch – reports that increased cancer fatalities will result from the redeployment of health resources caused by COVID hysteria. The BBC says the same. In fact, says Richard Sullivan, a professor of cancer and global health at King’s College London and director of its Institute of Cancer Policy:

The number of deaths due to the disruption of cancer services is likely to outweigh the number of deaths from the coronavirus itself. The cessation and delay of cancer care will cause considerable avoidable suffering. Cancer screening services have stopped, which means we will miss our chance to catch many cancers when they are treatable and curable, such as cervical, bowel and breast. When we do restart normal service delivery after the lockdown is lifted, the backlog of cases will be a huge challenge to the healthcare system.

According to the Daily Mail on October 6:

Vital operations were cancelled and patients missed out on potentially life-saving therapy in the spring because tackling Covid-19 became the sole focus of the health service, instead of cancer and other cruel diseases. 

Almost 2.5 million people missed out on cancer screening, referrals or treatment at the height of lockdown, even though the NHS was never overwhelmed — despite fears it would be crippled by the pandemic.

Experts now fear the number of people dying as a result of delays triggered by the treatment of coronavirus patients could even end up being responsible for as many deaths as the pandemic itself.

(2) A United Nations report in April warned that economic hardship generated by the radical interruptions of commerce could result in hundreds of thousands of additional child deaths in 2020. The report further warned that 42 million to 66 million children could fall into extreme poverty as a result of the crisis.

Even The Atlantic had to admit, “When you ask them to stay home, in many cases you’re asking them to starve.”

And in the UK, The Telegraph says, “The absurd demand that developing countries adopt economically disastrous lockdowns is driving untold misery.”

(3) The Well Being Trust in Oakland, California, released a study that seeks to determine how many “deaths of despair” (from drug or alcohol abuse or suicide) will occur as a result of the pandemic, including the lockdowns. Their estimate, according to CBS News: about 75,000.

(4) UNICEF warned of 1.2 million child deaths — “visits to health care centers are declining due to lockdowns, curfews and transport disruptions, and as communities remain fearful of infection.”

(5) Oxford University’s Sunetra Gupta has pointed to warnings by global authorities that as many as 130 million people are at risk of starvation thanks to the possibility of famine in several dozen places around the world, brought on by lockdown-induced disruptions of supply chains.

(6) Suicidal ideation is massively on the rise in the United States.

The federal government’s Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reports on percentages of people who have considered suicide within the previous 12 months, organized by age.

People between the ages of 18 and 25 fluctuate between 6.8 percent and 11 percent.

Now, from the Centers for Disease Control, we find that percentage (for the 18-24 group) has leaped to 25.5 percent — and this survey asks not about the previous 12 months, like the earlier one, but whether they’ve considered suicide just in the past 30 days.

(7) The CDC estimates 93,814 non-COVID “excess deaths” this year, including 42,427 from cardiovascular conditions, 10,686 from diabetes, and 3646 from cancer, and many of these were caused by the cancellation of “nonessential” care in the midst of the COVID panic.

Meanwhile, almost no American hospitals were actually “overwhelmed” during 2020, despite what your Facebook friends told you. In April alone, 1.4 million health care workers were furloughed because the hospitals were empty. In May NPR reported on those field hospitals that were assembled to take care of the surge of people who were supposed to appear: “U.S. Field Hospitals Stand Down, Most Without Treating Any COVID-19 Patients.”

(8) According to The Lancet, “During lockdown people with dementia or severe mental illness had a higher risk of excess death.” Dementia patients had a 53% greater chance of death because of lockdowns and elderly patients with severe mental illness had a 123% greater chance of death.

(9) As a direct result of the lockdowns, the New York Times reports that there will be 1.4 million excess tuberculosis deaths, half a million excess HIV deaths, and 385,000 malaria deaths.

See why “public health” shouldn’t be confused with “the monomaniacal fixation on one virus”?

Meanwhile, if you look at the charts for country after country and state after state, you will not be able to tell which ones locked down, how hard they locked down, when they lifted their lockdown, whether they had a mask mandate, when they imposed such a mandate, and when and if they lifted that mandate. The charts show zero correlation. Zero.

For example: for masks, click here. “If we only wore masks at the beginning this wouldn’t have happened” is hereby refuted.

Non-pharmaceutical interventions — voodoo, we might well call it now — appear to have accomplished nothing, apart from creating all this avoidable misery around the world.

This is why, instead, you should listen to these professors from Oxford, Harvard, and Stanford.

And read my free eBook Your Facebook Friends Are Wrong About the Lockdown.

Read the original article at TomWoods.com. http://tomwoods.com/death-by-lockdown/

 

 

 

 

Tom Woods Censored

Well, if you did not already think that you live in some kind of nightmare dystopia world where free discussion is censored, here you go.  Tom Woods, a libertarian (non Trump supporter for all the people stuck in the left/right paradigm) was taken down from YouTube for daring to have a contradictory opinion.  I posted this video on the website before but it is worth posting it again. They obviously took down the video because Tom Wood’s arguments were so effective. Everything is based on facts but that is not going to stop these warped individuals from silencing any dissent whatsoever.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/MWLzMDE23Sr4/

 

 

.

Libertarian CEO of Overstock: Election was Rigged

Being libertarian leaning, I have known of Patrick Byrne for a long time.  He even bought a stockpile of gold for his company as CEO just in case there was ever a financial crisis and he had to pay his employees.  I considered that a wise move and still do.  I have not heard about him for a number of years and it seems that he has purposely been keeping a low profile.  Now, with the greatest election theft in human history, Patrick Byrne is back in the fight. 

 

 

 

 

NY, Heroes Fight Back Against Evil Commie Government!

Buffalo NY,

NYcommies2

This video truly brought joy to my heart!  These gym owners and some of their patrons were meeting at the gym to discuss how to deal with the new commie edicts comming from on high from Cummo in New York.  Then some sheriffs come in with a public health inspector to tell them to close down and wear masks.  This group of patriotic heroes drove them from the presmise by telling these government goons that this is private property and to get out!  These men here are the heirs of the sons of liberty from 200 years ago.  They know authoritatin overreach when they see it!  Take heart America, the resistance is starting!

More and more of this will be happening but we need to get more organized.  This worked for now, and we should all encourage this kind of resistance but we have to be ready.  We have the whole media against us and almost the whole government is under globalist control.  There has never been a more important time than now for the future of human civilization.  These people are planning on some kind of nightmare world of prison style lockdowns, forced DNA altering vaccinations, and implanted chips in every human being.  Every part of this agendga must be resisted.  This is life or death, free humanity or a slave planet.  If you are not resisting against this system, you are plugged into the matrix and thus also an enemy of free humanity.  If I can sum up my political beliefs in one word, it is pro-human.   I want a pro-human future that respects human dignity.  The globalists want a technocratic dictatorship where every human is controlled through technology.  We have two futures.  Which one will you choose?

NY commies

Screen-Shot-2020-11-23-at-11.39.05-PM

The Satanic Pedophiles are about to be “Taken Out”

Obviously America has child sexual predators at some tops levels of government. Anyone who has been studying the globalist power structure for years like I have has to come this conclusion. Omaha has actually been one of the epicenters for this.  

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OmX2kmQdaDet/

(more details here and here)

Originally filmed for the Discovery Channel, Conspiracy of Silence was at the last minute canceled from airing on TV dispite the millions of dollars that went into the production of the documentary.  Powerful forces did not want it to air.  The documentary goes into wide spread child sexual abuse going on in Omaha for the benefit of the rich and powerful that reached all the way up to the White House and the Pentagon. As distubing as the documentary is, it does not even go into all the highly disturbing satanic side of these events.  Either way, it was too much for the power structure to be allowed to be revealed.

Interestingly, more and more people are claiming that this is all coming to a head and that powerful forces within our government are at war with these dark forces.  I don’t have any evidence for this but if their claims prove to be true, it would be the most imporant event to ever happen in American history.  True or not, I think it is a good idea to keep my readers abreast of these events and to be honest… I am intrigued. 

Robert David Steele has an extensive background in intelligence. He served three back-to-back clandestine tours while in the CIA.  Also Served as Special Assistant and Deputy Director, U.S Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA).  Full bio here. Long story short, Robert David Steele is not just some random guy on the internet but someone that should be taken seriously. 

 

 

Trump attorney Lin Wood goes into more details about what we are up against.  Much of what he talks about I can not confirm but it is sure interesting.

 

 

 

Pfizer VP Speaks Out Against Lockdowns, Masks, and PCR Tests. Most Censored Video on the Internet!

One of the best educational videos that I have seen on the “Pandemic” and PCR tests.  The interview is with Former Pfizer Vice President Mike Yeadon.  He goes into great detail about how the strategies that the government is using will only make things worse.  The video is so convincing that YouTube banned it within less than two hours.  That should tell you something.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LBeo24BvA5PU/

Dr Michael Yeadon’s Bio:

Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988.

Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers.

Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008.

Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company.

Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.

 

More on Michael Yeadon and his work here and here, both are great reads and should be checked out.